The evident requirements in this case are shelter, clothing, and food (that supports nourishment). The final point is a significant one because his comprehension of the state is that it develops since it accomplishes particular functional requirements (Plato 261). Intelligence causes the republic to be wise, bravery causes it to be brave, moderation signifies the perception that everyone distinguishes his or her task, while fairness signifies the concord that results where everybody is actively involved in accomplishing his or her task and does not interfere with that of different individuals. “intelligence, bravery, moderation and fairness” (Plato 309). Plato versus Aristotle: The Purpose of IndividualsĪs aforementioned, Plato’s “ideal state” is typified by the ruling of the Philosopher-Kings as it is anchored in four virtues, viz. Therefore, argumentatively, Plato’s Republic is objective while Aristotle’s Politics is subjective. On the other hand, Aristotle’s Politics merely embraces the voices of Aristotle, but the content is not systematized with a conclusion in mind. Plato’s Republic, in an extremely organized way, depicts an ideal society with the use of the Socratic Method. Whereas Politics is held up very slackly by the theme, Republic is a merged text. Probably, a disparity that comes up is that Politics is entirely different in construction as compared to The Republic. This essay explains the differing perspectives of Aristotle’s Politics and Plato’s Republic.

Plato’s Republic endeavors to create an “ideal state” typified by the ruling of the Philosopher-Kings while Aristotle’s Politics sticks to reality, a regime of identifying the partly suitable assertions of democrats, oligarchs, and aristocracy. Plato was a great philosopher as well as a teacher whose most renowned student, Aristotle, holds differing views.

Ideal state of aristotle